Reverend Darkness's Profile

My nitpick... 1. If you hope to be a grown-up type news site, don't use a badly inflated graphic showing only part of a 68K Mac "Sad Mac" screen. Seriously, this is the 21st century, and graphics software is a dime-a-dozen. 2. Perhaps a new take on the same rumours passed around by Apple-denegrators for 20 years is nice for some, but not for me. If I wanted stale conspiracy theories, I'd listen to Art Bell. 3. Every reason listed in the article as to why there will be no more Macs could also be used to show how there will be ONLY Macs in 2010. 4. Running out of cat names means no more OS? Oh... OK... that makes purrfect sense. Running out of 90's numbers sure meant that Microsoft couldn't come out with anything new... 4. When writing an article about why there won't be Macs, don't ever - EVER - say that it will be because a Microsoft OS will be more secure. Ever. It hasn't been the truth in the past and it won't be the truth in the future. 5. When writing an article about why there won't be Macs, don't ever - EVER - say that it's because they are too expensive. An Intel iMac is comparable in price to a Sony or Dell with similar speed, RAM, and additional software, yet comes with a display. An Intel Mini is will included all the same software, but will be cheaper than the previously mentioned Sony or Dell.